Two numbers decide a build-to-rent deal before you ever see the dirt: what the land costs and what the build costs. In Wichita, both start low — and these are Bids’ first-party figures, on actuals, not a national calculator.

LAND BASIS
~$29K / LOT
BUILD COST
~$108 / SF
YIELD ON COST
12–15%

Set that ~$108/sf construction cost against a national average of about $162 a square foot to build, and a yield on cost that has run roughly double the 7–8% the industry targets, and you see why out-of-state money is looking at Kansas. These are ranges off projects we have finished, not a quote on your deal — scale, finishes, and density move every one of them. What they show is the floor this market starts from, and how far a real operator can take it. The question was never whether the math works here. It is how you start your version of it from a thousand miles away.

The demand is real, and that is exactly why it is mispriced.

Wichita does not look like a boom town on paper, which is the whole opportunity. The metro added jobs at +2.3% over the past year — above the national pace, anchored by an aviation-manufacturing base that does not blink. Apartment rents average about $963 a month, well under the national average, and the metro is structurally short of homes — on our read of the data, roughly 17,000 of them. Cheap to build, tight on supply, growing on jobs.

That combination is what out-of-state capital spends months hunting for. In most markets you pay up for it. In Wichita it is sitting in plain sight, because the story is quiet and the numbers are loud.

The distance was never the risk. The team is.

Built-for-rent is now a structural share of new construction, not a fad — around 7% of single-family starts nationally against a long-run average of 2.7%. Almost none of that capital lives where it builds. Build-to-rent is an operator’s game by design: money from one place, dirt in another, a local team holding the two together. Moving money across state lines is a solved problem. Out-of-state investors already build here. The part that actually carries risk is who is standing on the lot.

A strong pro forma in the wrong hands still loses money. Construction projects across asset classes typically run 20% longer than scheduled and up to 80% over budget. You cannot see that coming from a thousand miles out. Someone on the ground has to — before it costs you.

The first 90 days: decision to shovel.

You do not need to move here, and you do not need to find the deal yourself. You need a basis and an operator. Locking those two is the whole job of the first ninety days.

01Days 0–15 · Define the boxCapital in, target yield, hold or sell, product type. One page — pressure-tested against real Wichita actuals, not a national calculator.
02Days 15–45 · Lock the basisLand near ~$29k a lot is the lever that sets the yield. Get it under control and underwrite the deal on numbers that already happened.
03Days 45–75 · Design & permitDesign-build and engineering under one contract. Product priced from actuals, so the plan and the build agree before a permit is pulled.
04Days 75–90 · Break groundThe under-120-day build clock starts. From here you get reporting, not surprises — and a finish line most of the way through the same year.
Ninety days from a phone call to a shovel — not because anyone rushed. Because the basis was locked and the product was priced before the first permit. Speed here is a byproduct of a system, not a sprint. See a 20-door phase modeled on these numbers.

What you are actually buying from out of state.

You are not hiring a contractor at the end of the chain. You are buying the operating layer between your capital and the dirt — the one who holds ~$108/sf when the national number says $162, who catches the overrun before it lands on your statement, and who tells you the deal does not hold before you wire the money. The numbers on this page are a starting range, not a promise: your scale, your finishes, your density move them. The operator is who takes that range and prices your actual box, then holds it — the difference between a benchmark and a bid. Distance cannot give you that. A spreadsheet cannot replace it. It is the one thing a green builder or a cost calculator can never copy — which is why vetting the operator matters more than vetting the market.

The numbers are real. Whether a deal holds is another question. A strong pro forma in the wrong hands still loses money — and seeing the trouble before it starts is the part no spreadsheet gives you. That is the job.

Start the ninety days.

Bring a lot, a market read, or just the capital and a target yield. We will run the first move on your actual basis — fifteen minutes, no pitch. And if the deal does not hold, we will tell you before you are in it. That is worth more than the fifteen minutes.

You do not have to be here to build here. You have to start right, and you have to have someone on the ground whose whole job is protecting your number. That is the deal.
How these numbers are sourced. Bids’ figures — ~$108/sf construction cost, ~$29k land basis, ~$310k all-in per build-to-rent duplex, 12–15% yield on cost, and under-120-day timelines — are first-party, drawn from our own completed Wichita projects and rounded so no single client’s deal is identifiable. They are ranges from finished work, not a quote or a guarantee for any one project: scale, finishes, density, and site conditions move every number, and your deal is priced to your actual box. National and market figures ($162/sf, 7–8% target yield, BTR share, job growth, rents, overrun rates) are linked inline to their sources. Figures are current as of publication and refreshed as new projects close.
Bids Contracting LLC · General Contractor · Wichita, KSEST. WICHITA